(alonenafraid)
Content: (24/30)
Started here and ended on the index. I'm split 50-50 on your site. Mostly because about half of what I read had to do with otherwebsites, or were extras. That is my own fault for reading through ones that were extras, but the ones about other sites...why do you need an explanation, when you have their link on the main page anyway? If we want to know what one of the links is, can't we go to the site and read about it ourselves?
Next, the rest of your entries were quite good. You delved into some good topics: religion, your life, things like that. They are strong emotional points, things you really applied your mind or your time to, and they are good entries for a reviewer to read. While I still don't feel like I really know you, or that you're letting much of yourself onto your site, those entries were very good, and I commend you for them. That being said, if you want to have great reviews, letting all of yourself pour into your site is essential. Your emotions are, usually, a great way for a reviewer to get to know who they're reading, and you hold back on that. I would suggest opening those floodgates for us reviewers!
Design: (28/30)
I'm glad I started on your site that describes your design. You made it yourself, the entry relates it to you, and the only thing I don't quite get is "it only takes a sprinkle." The rest of the design is all you, as you wrote about, so I say it's good. (It looks good matching and things too.)
Update: (6/10)
You've been doing better lately, but you had several weeks of no writing. No writing = bad for consistency = hard to review.
Navigation: (5/5)
Very nicely organized and easy to use.
Errors: (5/5)
Nah, not that I came across.
Contact: (6/5)
Emotionmap, guestbook, notes, email, guestmap, chatterbox.
Bonus: (15/15)
Extras, Links, Imood, Hugs. (and all included links)
Total: (89/100)
Further Comments:
You're = you are; your = belonging to you. Just reminding you.
Favorite Quote:
Didn't come across one.
Reviewed by: Valerie